U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Smith v. Luna

Smith v. Luna
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2005 · Kleinfeld, Tashima, Thomas
134 F. App'x 209

Smith v. Luna

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Alaska state prisoner Ruple Marx Smith appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir. 1999), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.