U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Paulson v. Carter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2005 · Kleinfeld, Tashima, Thomas

134 F. App'x 210

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.1

Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused *211its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Playmakers LLC v. ESPN, Inc., 376 F.3d 894, 896-97 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining standard of review).

The order denying the motion and amended motion for preliminary injunction are therefore AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. Appellees' unopposed motion to strike portions of appellant's Excerpts of Record and Supplemental Excerpts of Record is GRANTED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.