U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Cardenas-Espinoza

United States v. Cardenas-Espinoza
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2005 · Kleinfeld, Tashima, Thomas
134 F. App'x 214

United States v. Cardenas-Espinoza

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Gilberto Cardenas-Espinoza appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for illegal re-entry after *215deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Cardenas-Espinoza has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Cardenas-Espinoza has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.