Cerniglia v. Hunter
Cerniglia v. Hunter
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Steven Robert Cerniglia appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his 28
Appellant contends that the trial court erred at his re-commitment hearing when the prosecution produced only one doctor’s evaluation, rather than two, as required. However, because the California Court of Appeal has already awarded appellant the relief to which he was entitled, there is no injury for this Court to address, and the appeal is moot. See Munoz v. Rowland, 104 F.3d 1096, 1097-98 (9th Cir. 1997).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.