MEMORANDUM ***

This court has jurisdiction to review Mr. Paz’s petition challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen. See Medina-Morales v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 520, 527-28 (9th Cir. 2004).

The BIA did not err in concluding that, under its regulations, it had no jurisdiction to adjudicate Mr. Paz’s request for relief. *753See 8 C.F.R. § 1245.2(a)(1). Even if we were to reach the merits, Paz is inadmissible because he falsely represented himself to be a United States citizen. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a) (6) (C) (ii). He is also ineligible for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i), because the waiver applies only to § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i). He is thus ineligible for adjustment of status. 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i); see also Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921, 925 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting that an applicant for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i) must “be otherwise admissible to the United States.”) (emphasis in the original).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.