U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. McKeating

Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. McKeating
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2005
141 F. App'x 591

Counsel

Stanley L. Gibson, Esq., Marker E. Lovell, Esq., Gibson Robb & Lindh LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant., Mary McKeating, Emeryville, CA, pro se., William E. Vaughan, Esq., Law Offices, Oakland, CA, Thomas C. Burch, Tarkington O’Neill Barrack & Chong, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees., Steven R. Anthony, Esq., Anthony & Carlson, LLP, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Cross-Defendants-Appellees., Frederick J. Carr, Esq., Cox Wootton Griffin Hansen & Poulos, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppeUee.

Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. McKeating

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

For the reasons stated by the district court, we conclude that Firemen’s Insurance Company has not shown that McKeating made any intentional misrepresentations or unintentional misrepresentations material to the risk.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.