U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 15, 2005

141 F. App'x 650

Counsel

Brent J. Newell, Esq., Luke W. Cole, Caroline Farrell, Esq., Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Lawrence Hartig, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee., Heidi P. Stern, Esq., Beckley Singleton, Chtd., Daniel F. Polsenberg, Esq., Las Vegas, NV, Sean Halloran, Esq., Hartig Rhodes Hoge & Lekdsch, Anchorage, AK, David S. Case, Esq., Copeland, Landye, Bennett & Wolf, Anchorage, AK, James E. Torgerson, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee (KRPC) appeals the district court’s denial of its Rule 59(e) and Rule 15(a) motions. For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

We DENY KRPC’s Rule 21 motion, as well as KRPC’s Motion to Strike Motion by Northwest Arctic Borough to Dismiss Appeal and to strike NAB as a party to the Appellees’ brief.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.