Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 15, 2005
141 F. App'x 650

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Kivalina Relocation Planning Committee (KRPC) appeals the district court’s denial of its Rule 59(e) and Rule 15(a) motions. For the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

We DENY KRPC’s Rule 21 motion, as well as KRPC’s Motion to Strike Motion by Northwest Arctic Borough to Dismiss Appeal and to strike NAB as a party to the Appellees’ brief.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑