United States v. Sbrusch
United States v. Sbrusch
Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
The above captioned case is re-submitted.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Leroy Sbrusch has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sbrusch did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sbrusch’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.