U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Medel

United States v. Medel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 18, 2005 · Nelson, Tallman, Wardlaw
145 F. App'x 622

United States v. Medel

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Salvador Vasquez Medel appeals the 60-month sentence imposed following his conviction by guilty plea to giving a false statement in an immigration matter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), and unlawful reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).

Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.