U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Nava

United States v. Nava
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 18, 2005 · Nelson, Tallman, Wardlaw
151 F. App'x 533

United States v. Nava

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Israel Martinez Nava appeals the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a). Because appellant was sentenced under mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, we remand for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 *534(9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Ame-line’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.