U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2005

Broomfield v. Daniels

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2005 · Fisher, Fletcher, Goodwin

154 F. App'x 680

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner James Broomfield appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir. 1999), we affirm. For the reasons stated by the district court, petitioner has not shown that due process was violated in depriving him of good time credits.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.