U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ladwig

United States v. Ladwig
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 26, 2006

United States v. Ladwig

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-30393 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00232-RHW CRAIG ALLEN LADWIG,  Eastern District Defendant-Appellant. of Washington, Spokane  ORDER Filed January 27, 2006 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge.

ORDER In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdic- tion and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Ladwig’s sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehear- ing En Banc has expired.

*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

1179 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.