U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Hulteen v. At&t

Hulteen v. At&t
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 19, 2006

Hulteen v. At&t

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOREEN HULTEEN; ELEANORA  COLLET, ARMA HORTON; ELIZABETH SNYDER; COMMUNICATIONS No. 04-16087 WORKERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. CV-01-01122-MJJ v. ORDER AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.  Filed July 19, 2006 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judges Kleinfeld and Rawlinson are recused.

8289 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.