Dagher v. Saudi
Dagher v. Saudi
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOUAD N. DAGHER; BISHARAT ENTERPRISES INC.; ALFRED BUCZKOWSKI; ESEQUIEL DELAGADO; MAHWASH FARZANEH; NASSER EL- RADI; G.G.&R. PETROLEUM INC.; H.J.F. INC.; KALECO CO.; CARLOS MARQUEZ; SAMI MERHI, EDGARDO R. PARUNGAO; RON ABEL SERV.
CENTER, INC.; GULLERMO RAMIREZ; JERRY’S SHELL SERV. CENTER, INC.; LEOPOLOO RAMIREZ; NAZAR No. 02-56509 SHEIBAINI; SITARA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; TINSEL ENTERPRISES D.C. No. CV-99-06114-GHK INC.; QUANG TRUONG; STEVEN RAY VEZERIAN; LOS FELIZ SHELL, INC.; Central District NASSIM HANNA, of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Los Angeles v. ORDER SAUDI REFINING INC., (SRI); TEXACO INC.; SHELL OIL COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, and MOTIVA ENTERPRISES LLC; EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC; EQUIVA TRADING COMPANY; EQUIVA SERVICES LLC, Defendants.
17711 17712 DAGHER v. SAUDI REFINING INC. On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed October 24, 2006 Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
ORDER Pursuant to the Supreme Court judgment, we affirm the dis- trict court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants.
PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.