U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Christopher Ray Plouffe

United States v. Christopher Ray Plouffe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2006 · Gould, Berzon, Schwarzer
437 F.3d 917; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 3368; 2006 WL 319040 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Christopher Ray Plouffe

Opinion

ORDER

The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs addressing whether the court has jurisdiction to review the reasonableness of Appellant’s sentence, which is within the Guidelines range, in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); our pre-Booker precedent such as United States v. Reed, 914 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Pelayo-Bautista, 907 F.2d 99 (9th Cir. 1990); and the holding of Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893, 900 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The parties are directed to file simultaneous letter briefs on or before fifteen (15) days from the filed date of this order. The briefs shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages (double-spaced)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.