U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Brand X Internet Services v. Federal Communications Commission

Brand X Internet Services v. Federal Communications Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2006 · Cudahy, Scannlain, Thomas
435 F.3d 1053; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1573 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Harvey L. Reiter, Esq., Morrison & Hecker L.L.P., Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Esq., John W. Butler, Esq., Sher & Blackwell, Washington, DC, Frederick A. Polner, Esq., Rothman Gordon, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, William P. Barr, Esq., Arlington, VA, Tillman L. Lay, Esq., Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone, P.L.C., Washington, DC, for Petitioners., Ellen Levine, Esq., California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners/Intervenor., Michael S. Schooler, Esq., Nat’I. Cable Television Assn., Inc., Sean A. Lev, Attorney, Robert J. Aamoth, Esq., Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Jodie L. Kelley, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, David E. Mills, Esq., Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, David L. Lawson, Esq., Sidley Austin, LLP, Jonathan Jacob Nadler, Squire Sanders & Dempsey, LLP, Michael W. Fleming, Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP, Andrew G. McBride, Esq., Eve J. Klindera, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, Washington, DC, for Intervenors., Chief, Appellate Section, U.S. Department of Justice, James M. Carr, Esq., General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Litigation Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Brand X Internet Services v. Federal Communications Commission

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in National Cable & Telecomms. Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Servs., — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 (2005), the Federal Communications Commission’s declaratory ruling is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.