U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Robles-Maitorena

United States v. Robles-Maitorena
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 17, 2006 · Hug, Scannlain, Silverman
163 F. App'x 529

United States v. Robles-Maitorena

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Lorenzo Robles-Maitorena appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because Robles-Maitorena was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing judge to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.