U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Jarvis

United States v. Jarvis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2006 · Hug, Scannlain, Silverman
163 F. App'x 583

United States v. Jarvis

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Mark Anthony Jarvis appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to making a false statement on a bankruptcy petition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jarvis contends that the case should be remanded for a correction of the written judgment to conform with the district court’s oral pronouncement of his sentence. We disagree. Because the oral pronouncement was ambiguous, the unambiguous written judgment controls. See Fenner v. United States Parole Commission, 251 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.