Aguirre v. Hubbard
Aguirre v. Hubbard
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Curtis Eugene Aguirre appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his twenty-five years to life sentence imposed after his no contest plea for possession of 0.1 gram of a substance containing methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Eslaminia v. White, 136 F.3d 1234, 1236 (9th Cir. 1998), and we dismiss.
Aguirre contends that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. His contention is procedurally barred, see Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 729, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991), and lacks merit, see Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003); Rios v. Garcia, 390 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2004).
DISMISSED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.