MEMORANDUM **

Mario Alberto Richards-Diaz petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for a waiver of deportation under 8 U.S.C. *11§ 1182(c), and cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. This court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) and we deny his petition for review.

Even if Richards-Diaz is eligible for a discretionary waiver for his 1996 offense, he is still removable because he is ineligible for a discretionary waiver for his 1997 offense or for cancellation of removal. Richards-Diaz does not qualify for a discretionary waiver for his 1997 offense because he was convicted of being under the influence of methamphetamine after the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) § 440(d) went into effect.1 Under AEDPA as it existed then, aliens convicted of certain enumerated offenses, including drug-related crimes, were not eligible for discretionary waivers.2 Therefore, the Immigration Judge properly concluded that Richards-Diaz was ineligible for a discretionary waiver of deportation for his 1997 offense.

The Immigration Judge also properly denied Riehards-Diaz’s application for cancellation of removal. Section 1229b(b)(1)(C) prohibits cancellation of removal when an alien is convicted of an aggravated felony.3 Richards-Diaz does not dispute that on February 21, 1996, he was convicted of an aggravated felony, transportation of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). Therefore, cancellation of removal is not available to him.

Because Richards-Diaz is ineligible for either form of relief, we deny his petition for review.

PETITION DENIED.