MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Gareia-Montoya, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the *80denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

Garcia-Montoya moved to reopen on the ground that his former attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel during his merits hearing and subsequent appeal from the denial of his cancellation of removal application. Garcia-Montoya cannot establish prejudice as a result of the alleged ineffective representation because he admitted he has no active relationship with his daughter, his only qualifying relative for purposes of establishing hardship. Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to reopen. See id. at 901 (explaining that ineffective assistance of counsel must prejudice the alien to merit reopening).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.