U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Bell v. District Court of Tacoma

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 24, 2006 · Goodwin, Rawlinson, Schroeder

171 F. App'x 543

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and appellant’s response to the November 21, 2005 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.