United States v. Saucedo-Cruz
United States v. Saucedo-Cruz
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Raul Saucedo-Cruz appeals his 70-month sentence imposed following his jury conviction of being found in the United States after illegal re-entry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.
Saucedo-Cruz contends that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by imposing a sentence in excess of the two-year maximum set forth m 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) based on a prior conviction that was not proved to the jury. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 & n. 16 (9th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed, No. 05-8847 (filed Jan. 23, 2006); United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 914 & n. 8 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 636, 163 L.Ed.2d 515 (2005); United States v. Von Brown, 417 F.3d 1077, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 2005) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.