U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Gardner

United States v. Gardner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 18, 2006 · Callahan, Fletcher, Trott
180 F. App'x 694

United States v. Gardner

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Stephen Parker Gardner appeals the district court’s denial of his pre-trial mo*695tion for release of seized assets. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss.

Our jurisdiction is generally limited to “final decisions of the district courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Appellant is, in essence, seeking mandamus to compel the district court to hold a hearing to which he is not entitled. See United States v. Consiglio, 866 F.2d 310, 311 (9th Cir. 1989).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.