U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Bernal-Acosta

United States v. Bernal-Acosta
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 19, 2006 · Callahan, Fletcher, Trott
181 F. App'x 676

United States v. Bernal-Acosta

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Bernal-Acosta appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for distribution of cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Bernal-Acosta has filed a brief stating that she finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.