U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Rickman

United States v. Rickman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 19, 2006 · Berzon, Fernandez, Kleinfeld
185 F. App'x 679

United States v. Rickman

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jeffrey Rickman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for mail fraud and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1957.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Rickman has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief was filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.