U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Birdinground

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 29, 2006 · Callahan, Noonan, Pregerson

185 F. App'x 713

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The district court did not solicit the views of counsel before deciding whether to re-sentence Appellant Clifford G. BirdinGround under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1085 (9th Cir. 2005). This mistake requires us to re-remand the case for compliance with Ameline. See United States v. Montgomery, — F.3d -, 2006 WL 2473448, at *5 (9th Cir. Aug. 29, 2006).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.