Guevara v. Gonzales
Guevara v. Gonzales
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir. 2002). The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. Petitioner’s voluntary departure was tolled from the date on which the stay motion was filed and will be tolled until the expiration of the temporary stay. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c); Desta, 365 F.3d at 743-44.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
I dissent. This case, and the sixty-four others like it filed today, will have an adverse effect on children born in the United States whose parent/parents are illegal immigrants. When a parent is denied cancellation of removal, the govern
Furthermore, as a nation we should recognize that many children born of illegal immigrants serve and have served with honor and distinction in our military forces, and many have laid down their lives on the altar of freedom.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.