U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Bonnilla-Gutierez

United States v. Bonnilla-Gutierez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 26, 2006 · Alarcón, Hawkins, Thomas
192 F. App'x 629

United States v. Bonnilla-Gutierez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Bonnilla-Gutierez appeals from the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because Bonnilla-Gutierez was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sen*630tencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir. 2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error).

REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.