Campo-Diaz v. Gonzales
Campo-Diaz v. Gonzales
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Pablo Angel Martin Campo-Diaz and Gloria Cedillo-Olivarez, husband and wife
Petitioners’ contention that the IJ violated their due process rights by disregarding and misconstruing their evidence concerning Cedillo-Olivarez’s Type 1 diabetes is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.