U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Burgos-Flores

United States v. Burgos-Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2006 · Alarcón, Hawkins, Thomas
195 F. App'x 551

United States v. Burgos-Flores

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Burgos-Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and 63-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Burgos-Flores’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.