United States v. Zuniga-Camarena
United States v. Zuniga-Camarena
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Juan Zuniga-Camarena appeals from the 13-month sentence imposed following
Zuniga-Camarena contends that his sentence is unreasonable and that the district court failed to take into account all of the considerations set out to guide sentencing. His contention fails. To comply with the requirements of Booker, the district court must consider the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d 913, 918 (9th Cir. 2006). However, this “does not necessitate a specific articulation of each factor separately, but rather a showing that the district court considered the statutorily-designated factors in imposing a sentence.” See Knows His Gun, 438 F.3d at 918. Here, the district court properly considered the advisory Sentencing Guidelines and the § 3553(a) factors, specifically, promotion of respect for the law and the seriousness of the actual offense behavior. Id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.