U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Garcia-Salles

United States v. Garcia-Salles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2006
196 F. App'x 475

United States v. Garcia-Salles

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Agusto Garcia-Salles appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal *476alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Garcia-Salles’ contentions regarding Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), are foreclosed by this circuit’s case law. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that this court continues to be bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres).

In addition, Garcia-Salles’ contention that the district court’s condition of supervised release requiring him to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of reentry into the United States violates the Fifth Amendment is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir. 2006).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Bianco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.