U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Araujo-Garcia v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 11, 2006 · Hawkins, Reinhardt, Schroeder

197 F. App'x 617

Counsel

Artemio Araujo-Garcia, Riverside, CA, pro se., Marilu Araujo, Riverside, CA, pro se., Tania Jasmine Araujo, Riverside, CA, pro se., CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioners’ claim that their constitutional rights were violated by being placed in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings lacks merit. See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.