MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioners’ claim that their constitutional rights were violated by being placed in removal proceedings rather than deportation proceedings lacks merit. See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.