U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Elias v. Dominguez ex rel. Hemp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 11, 2006 · Hawkins, Reinhardt, Schroeder

197 F. App'x 633

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

*634All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.