U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Olabanji

United States v. Olabanji
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 15, 2006 · Graber, Nelson, Pregerson
202 F. App'x 183

United States v. Olabanji

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Olateju Olabanji appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release and imposition of a 24-month term of imprisonment, following his admitted violation of conditions of release in a previous sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Olabanji has filed a brief stating that he finds no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of revocation.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.