U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Barrett v. Hill

Barrett v. Hill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 19, 2006 · Graber, Nelson, Pregerson
202 F. App'x 217

Barrett v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

This appeal from the district court’s order denying a motion for a preliminary *218injunction comes to us under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3.

Applying the “limited and deferential” standard of review appropriate for preliminary injunction rulings, Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d 914, 918 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc), we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or clearly erroneous factual findings in denying preliminary injunctive relief, see Playmakers LLC v. ESPN, Inc., 376 F.3d 894, 896-97 (9th Cir. 2004).

The district court’s order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction is

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.