Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Ricardo v. Gonzales

Ricardo v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 25, 2006 · Clifton, Graber, Scannlain
202 F. App'x 267

Ricardo v. Gonzales

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *268raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (stating numerical limitations for motions to reopen and reconsider).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑