MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 (9th Cir. 2006); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2003). The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to petitioners Maria De Jesus Garcia, Agency No. A96-347-892, and Carlos Bernardo Onofre, Agency No. A96-347893.

In addition, with respect to petitioners, Diana Patricia Duran Garcia, Agency No. A96-347-894, and Daniel Duran Garcia, Agency No. A96-347-985, the court grants respondent’s motion for summary denial of the petition for review because these petitioners lack a qualifying relative under the statute and are therefore ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D) (requiring alien to show that “removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to the alien’s spouse, parent, or child, who is a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence”); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2002) (denying cancellation of removal where alien lacked a qualifying relative under the statute); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.