United States v. Cook
United States v. Cook
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Stephen Earl Cook appeals from the district court’s order revoking his super
Cook’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review.
When Cook completed his sentence upon revocation of supervised release, there ceased to be a case or controversy. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Palomba, 182 F.3d at 1123 & n. 3.
We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.