United States v. McKay
United States v. McKay
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Murray D. McKay appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing 24 months imprison
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for McKay has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. McKay has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.