Flores v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 1, 2006

Flores v. Gonzales, 208 F. App'x 605 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *606raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jose Martin Diaz FLORES v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General
Status: Published