U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Ruiz-Mejia v. Gonzales

Ruiz-Mejia v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 1, 2006 · Clifton, Gould, Leavy
209 F. App'x 665

Counsel

Alfonso Ruiz-Mejia, Eloy, AZ, pro se., Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Counsel, Office of the District Chief Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Phoenix, AZ, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Ruiz-Mejia v. Gonzales

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed the record and the response to the court’s May 22, 2006, order to show cause and we conclude the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, the court sua sponte denies this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.