U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Miller v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2006 · Goodwin, Kozinski, Shadur

209 F. App'x 690

Counsel

Don Paul Badgley, Esq., Mark J. Wilson, Esq., Badgley Mullins Law Group, PLLC, Brian G. Isaacson, Esq., Merriam & Isaacson, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Jay R. Weill, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Joan I. Oppenheimer, Esq., Gilbert S. Rothenberg, Esq., Richard Farber, Esq., Michael J. Haungs, Esq., Michael J. Haungs, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Moore v. Comm'r (United States Tax Court 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

For the reasons stated in United States v. Tuff, 469 F.3d 1249 (9th Cir. 2006), the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the United States is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.