United States v. Barro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Barro, 212 F. App'x 639 (9th Cir. 2006)
Fisher, Goodwin, Leayy

United States v. Barro

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Berner Alfredo Barro appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 93-month sentence imposed for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Barro has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States v. Berner Alfredo BARRO
Status
Published