Flores-Otero v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 21, 2006

Flores-Otero v. Gonzales, 214 F. App'x 672 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The motion to reopen was not filed within 90 days of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Margarita FLORES-OTERO v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General
Status: Published