Calzada v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 21, 2006

Calzada v. Gonzales, 214 F. App'x 697 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner cannot challenge the validity of his underlying convictions in this petition for review. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Oscar Garduno CALZADA v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General
Status: Published