Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2006

Ochoa v. Gonzales

Ochoa v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 27, 2006 · Goodwin, Leavy, Wallace
215 F. App'x 686

Ochoa v. Gonzales

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Rosalva Loeza Ochoa and Jose Ronny Molina Loeza, natives and citizens of Mexi*687co, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen, because the news articles attached to the motion were not material to petitioners’ claims for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *687courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑