Landrigan v. Schriro

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Landrigan v. Schriro, 501 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21063; 2007 WL 2473136

Landrigan v. Schriro

Opinion

ORDER

The mandate, issued on May 8, 2006, is recalled. In light of the Supreme Court’s mandate, issued on July 30, 2007, in Schriro v. Landrigan, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007), we vacate our en banc decision, Landrigan v. Schriro, 441 F.3d 638 (9th Cir. 2006), and affirm the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on Landrigan’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We again adopt the three-judge panel’s holdings with respect to the additional sentencing issues raised on appeal, Landrigan v. Stewart, 272 F.3d 1221, 1229-31 (9th Cir. 2001). Therefore, the district court’s denial of Landrigan’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jeffrey Timothy LANDRIGAN, A.K.A. Billy Patrick Wayne Hill, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
Cited By
8 cases
Status
Published