Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., 482 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 2007)
2007 WL 979842

Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.

Opinion of the Court

*1132ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Grisham v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 40 Cal.4th 623, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 735, 151 P.3d 1151 (2007), and in light of the Joint Report of the Parties Re: Decision of the California Supreme Court on the Certified Questions, the judgments of the district court are VACATED and we REMAND to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the California Supreme Court. In light of the Joint Report of the Parties Re: Decision of the California Supreme Court on the Certified Questions, we also VACATE our previous order of March 16, 2007 calling for supplemental briefing from the parties in Cannata v. Philip Morris, 03-56018.

Reference

Full Case Name
Leslie J. GRISHAM v. PHILIP MORRIS U.S.A., a corporation Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company Corp., individually and as successor to the American Tobacco Company and its predecessor in interest, British American Tobacco Industries, PLC, Defendants-Appellees Maria Cannata v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., aka Philip Morris Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published